I am still “used to” do manual focusing, however with a “Schnittbildindikator” on the “Mattscheibe”, so I have no idea how easy it will be for me to use the techniques described for the A7 (shimmering pixels, focus magnifying, focus peaking). I rarely see reviews of this 200/2,8, any idea why? And, you only make comments on the 50/1,4 and the 50/2, is the 50/1,7 much worse? I own three prime lenses, the “kit lens” 50/1,7, a 135/2,8 and a very nice 200/2,8. I started photographing with a Minolta X-700 and used it regularly until 2008. Novoflex: * | * | *įor other mounts check out my Minolta SR-mount adapter guide.įor more information on adapters check out our extensive Guide to Adapters.įirst of all, thank you very much for your great site and contents on the Sony A7 and using it with old manual-focus lenses. Their prices differ a lot between the markets and I would recommend the cheaper one. My peace of mind recommendation are Novoflex and Rayqual adapters. My budget recommendation is the K&F II adapter: * | * | * Zeiss 2.8/28 vs Sony FE 2/28 vs Minolta MC 2/28. Review: Minolta AF APO Tele 200mm 1:2.8.Manual Minolta lenses – List with ratings and short description Minolta SR mount
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |